KUNWAR SINGH BISHT Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) MR. Sobhit Saharia, Adv. for the petitioner, Sri N. B. Tewari, learned Addl. Advocate General/chief Standing Counsel assisted by Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Sri Sudhanshu Dhulia, learned Sr. Coun sel assisted by Sri Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 2.

(2.) BY the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : a. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus command ing/directing the respondents to regularise the services of the pe titioner on the post of electrician in the respondent department, b. Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner, c. Allow the writ petition with cost.

(3.) THE petitioner was granted one week time on 21-02-2006 for filing re joinder affidavit. On 26-04-2006 the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner. Again on 06-06-2006, the petitioner was granted two weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit, however no rejoinder affidavit has been filed till today. On 28-0/-2006, the case was listed under the title for order matters; on that date this Court passed order to list the case on Monday i. e. on 31st July 2006 under the caption of final hearing. Accordingly, the parties were heard at length.