SHITLA PRASAD YADAV Vs. FARIDAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LIST has been revised. Learned Counsel for the parties are not present.

(2.) THE afore -mentioned applica ­tion has been filed on behalf of Shitla Prasad and Kashi Nath, plaintiffs -appel ­lants Nos. 1 and 2, respectively in the Second Appeal.

(3.) THE afore -mentioned applica ­tion is supported by a joint affidavit, sworn on 18 -5 -1992 by the said Shitla Prasad (plaintiff -appellant No. 1) and the said Kashi Nath (plaintiff - appellant MO. 2).