JAVED JAMEEL Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE LUCKNOW

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Sharma, J. Heard Sri J. N. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Sri Saurabh Lawania has put in appearance on behalf of Smt. Hafsa Mahmood, opposite party No. 3.

(2.) THE petitioner has assailed the judgment and order dated 20-4- 2004 passed by the Prescribed Authority/civil Judge, Mohanlalganj (Senior Division), Lucknow as also the judgment and order dated 15- 9-2005 passed by the District Judge, Lucknow. THE learned Courts below have recorded concurrent findings of facts and the application of the landlady for release of House No. 116/153, Ghasiari Mandi, Kaiserbagh, Lucknow, hereafter referred to as the premises, has been allowed. THE order passed by the prescribed authority for release of the premises has been upheld by the learned Appellate Court, District Judge, Lucknow.

(3.) THE learned prescribed authority/civil Judge (Senior Division), Mohanlalganj, Lucknow allowed the application for release and passed a specific order on 20-4-2005 for vacation of the premises. THE learned prescribed authority also observed that a copy of the order passed by it be sent to the U. P. Power Corporation, employer of Smt. Nahid Javeed, wife of the tenant, who was receiving Rs. 1470/- as H. R. A. while living inn the premises in question for meagre rent of Rs. 25/- per month only.