MOHAN CHANDRA UPRETI Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri C. D. Bahuguna, counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) THE present writ petition has been preferred seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the order dated 28-02-2005 contained in annexure-3 to the writ petition. THE pe titioner has also claimed notional pro motion on the post of Forester w. e. f. 25-05-1976 with all consequential benefits of promotion.

(3.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, after repeated requests made to the depart mental authorities, the petitioner could be confirmed on the post of Plantation Zamadar as late as in the year 1984 whereas he was entitled for being con firmed on the post of Plantation earlier to his junior colleague in the year 1976 itself. The petitioner was not granted ret rospective confirmation on the post of Plantation Zamadar w. e. f. 01-04-1973 in the same manner as the junior person Shri Uttam Singh Nayal, had been granted confirmation on the post of Plantation Zamadar retrospectively w. e. f. 01 -04-1973.