REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

TULSI Appellant

V/S

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BHOLA NATH VARSHNEY V. MULK RAJ MADAN [REFERRED TO]
RAMJI DIXIT DEAD VS. BHIRGUNATH [REFERRED TO]
V TULASAMMA VS. SESHA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
AMAR SINGH VS. ASSTT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY PAL SINGH VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION [REFERRED TO]
C MASILAMANI MUDALIAR VS. IDOL OF SRI SWAMINATHASWAMI SWAMINATHASWAMI THIRUKOIL [REFERRED TO]
RAM AVTAR VS. RAM DHANI [REFERRED TO]
BHOOMIREDDY CHENNA REDDY VS. BHOOSPALLI PEDDA VERRAPPA [REFERRED TO]
SEETHALAKSHMI AMMAL VS. MUTHUVENKATARAMA IYENGAR [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUBARSINGH VS. GULAB SINGH [REFERRED TO]
BRAHMA VART SANATAN DHARMA MAHAMANDAL VS. KANHYALAL BAGLA [REFERRED TO]
PALCHURI HANUMAYAMMA VS. TADIKAMALLA KOTLINGAM D [REFERRED TO]
V MUTHUSAMI VS. ANGAMMAL [REFERRED TO]
SHARAD SUBRAMANYAN VS. SOUMI MAZUMDAR [REFERRED TO]
PREMA DEVI VS. JOINT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION HEAD AUARTER AT GORAKHPUR CAMP AND [REFERRED TO]
RAM JAG MISIR VS. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION U P [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) SHRIMATI Gangajali died in 1971. On her death dispute arose regarding succession to the agricultural land left behind by her. Tulsi and others, original petitioners, based their claim upon succession as reversioners under Hindu Law and Lalji, petitioner in connected Writ Petition No. 3186 of 1975 claimed succession on the ground that he had been adopted by SHRIMATI Gangajali. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ballia through judgement and order dated 13.1.1975 passed in Revision Nos. 528, 529, 565 and 566 held that SHRIMATI Gangajali did not leave behind any heir, hence her agricultural property vested in State on the principle of escheat.The said judgment was challenged by both, i.e., Tulsi and others and Lalji. Number of writ petition filed by Lalji was 3181 of 1975. Both the writ petitions were disposed of by this Court through common judgment dated 13.11.1991. This Court held that adoption of Lalji by Gangajali has been proved.

(3.) IN view of the above permission granted by the Supreme Court this review petition has been filed.

Click here to view full judgment.

TULSI Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address