PRABHA ARORA Vs. BRIJ MOHINI ANAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 read with Ar ticle 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioners (tenants) have challenged the judgment and order dated 16-03-2004, passed by learned Additional District Judge/et. C. I, Dehradun, in Rent Con trol Appeal No. 57 of 2001, whereby re versing the order dated 08- 05-2001, passed by Prescribed Authority, in PA. Case No. 19 of 1995, has allowed the application for release of the premises in question in favour of the landlord.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(3.) IN its writ jurisdiction, this Court cannot go into the correctness of the fac tual satisfaction of the appellate court unless the same is perverse. As such, the findings on the bonafide need of the landlord and on the point of compara tive hardship being finding of fact, can be disturbed by this Court only if the same is perverse or against the provi sions of law.