LAWS(ALL)-2006-4-88

ZAKIR Vs. STATE

Decided On April 17, 2006
ZAKIR Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS criminal appeal has been pre ferred by the appellants Zakir and Rashid against the judgment and order dated 2/ -11 -1993, passed by the Ad ditional Sessions Judge, Roorkee, in Sessions trial No. 10 of 1991 State ver sus Zakir and others convicting the ac cused/appellants Zakir and Rashid U/ss 364, 302 and 201 I. P. C. and sentencing both of them to undergo 10 years R. I. U/ S 364 I. RC. ; life imprisonment U/s 302 I. P. C. and 2 years R. I. U/s 201 I. P. C. All the sentences were to run concurrently. Co -accused Masoom Ali and Parash Nath were acquitted U/s 201 I. P. C. for which they were charged.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that on 31 -5 -1990 Sundar Lal resident of Mohalla Bahar Qilla Manglaur lodged first information report at RS. Manglaur District Haridwar with the allegations that on 31 -5 -1990 his daughter Km. Mamtesh was sewing clothes at his house. At about 10 A. M. accused Rashid Ali came at his house and car ried his daughter Km. Mamtesh on the pretext that her sister has called her. When his daughter did not return, the complainant made search for her but all in vain. He also alleged in the FI. R. that Km. Mamtesh was aged about 13 years. He also suspected that Km. Mamtesh may be murdered by Rashid and his elder brother Zakir. On the ba sis of the written F. I. R. chick F. I. R. Ext. Ka. 3 was prepared at the Police Station Manglaur and a case U/s 364 I. P. C. was registered against accused Rashid and Zakir in the General Diary, the car bon copy of which is Ext. Ka. 4.

(3.) S . I. Yogendra Kumar Sharma has conducted the investigation in the case. On 1 -6 -1990. he recorded the statements of the witnesses and pre pared the site -plan, Ext. Ka. 5, of the room of the complainant where his daughter Km. Mamtesh was sewing clothes. On 2 -6 -1990 the I. O. took into his possession the cycle in which the dead body of Km. Mamtesh was alleg edly carried by accused and prepared recovery memo, Ext. Ka. 8. He made search of the accused. On 3 -6 -90 at about 2. 30 P. M. arrested accused Zakk and Rashid. On 4 -6 -1990 the I. O. in terrogated the accused Zakir. Accused Zakir informed the I. O. that the scarf (Chunari) of Km. Mamtesh was kept by him at his house. At this the I. O. made entry of this fact at report no. 14 at 8. 50 A. M. and carried the accused to the place where the scarf (Chunari) was kept by him. The accused handed over the scarf (Chunari) after taking out from inside his house in presence of public witnesses Hari Kishan Gupta and Madho Ram. Sundar Lal and Saroj were also present there. The I. O. pre pared recovery memo, Ext. Ka. 2 of scarf and also prepared site plan of the place of recovery, Ext. Ka. 6. The com plainant Sundar Lal and his wife Smt. Saroj identified the Chunari belonged to their daughter Km. Mamtesh. The accused also confessed to the I. O. that Mamtesh was" murdered by them. The I. O. prepared the site -plan, Ext. Ka. 7 of the place where Km. Mamtesh was al legedly murdered. He also prepared site plan, Ext. Ka. 9 of the place where the dead body of Km. Mamtesh was thrown by the accused after committing her murder. Thereafter the investigation was transferred to S. I. Ajay Kumar Yadav, who after completion of inves tigation, submitted charge sheet, Ext. Ka. 11 against the accused/appellants Rashid and Zakir and co -accused Masoom Ali and Parash Nath.