LAWS(ALL)-2006-12-112

KANT MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On December 15, 2006
KANT MISHRA Appellant
V/S
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. N. Srivastava, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University as well as learned Standing Counsel and perused the materials on record.

(2.) ON the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of finally.

(3.) THE Apex Court in Paragraph 6. 5. 7. of the judgment has clearly directed that a candidate shall not have a previous criminal record, that is to say he should not have been tried and/or convicted of any criminal offence or misdemeanour. Paragraph 6. 5. 7. of the judgment is being reproduced below: "6. 5. 7. THE candidate shall not have a previous criminal record, that is to say he should not have been tried and/or convicted of any criminal offence or misdemeanour. THE candidate shall also not have been subject to any disciplinary action by the university authorities. "