MANGAL SINGH Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record.

(2.) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the judg ment of the Board of Revenue dated 20-10-1983 (Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition) whereby the Board of Revenue allowed the review petition and the judg ment dated 30-8-1982 passed in Second Appeal No. 23 of 1979-80 has been set aside.

(3.) AGAINST the judgment and order of the Board of Revenue, a review peti tion was filed by Urmila Devi Jain, re spondent no. 4, in Second Appeal No. 23 of 1979-80, which was allowed on 30-8-1982 on the ground that the error apparent on the face of record exists in the judgment. The review petition was heard by the same Member of the Board of Revenue and it was allowed on 20-10-1983 and it was observed that the appeal would be heard after obtaining trial court record of grant of Bhumidhari Sanad.