HARISH CHANDRA Vs. DEEP CHANDRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HIMANSHU Kumar The SDO, Jasarana, by his order dated 7-8-1955 directed that the Kurras allotted to the opposite party No. 1 Harish Chandra be allotted to the opposite party No. 2 Ramesh Chandra and those allotted to the opposite party No. 2, Ramesh Chandra be allotted to the opposite party No. 1 Harish Chandra in proceedings under Section 176 of U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act. Against this order a revision filed in the Court of the Additional Commissioner, Agra was dismissed by his order dated 20-1-1997. Against which the present revision has been filed before the Board of Revenue.

(2.) THE grounds of revision basically are that a preliminary decree was passed on 14-5-1992. THE Lekhpal filed kurras on 17-9-1993, Ramesh Chandra filed his objection on 10-11-1993 and Deep Chandra filed objection on 24-12-1993. It is alleged in the grounds that Rakesh Chandra and Deep Chandra in their objection demanded the kurras of each other, that is, a mututal exchange of kurras; whereas Harish Chandra did not file any objection nor were any objections filed on his kurras. It was alleged in the grounds before this Court that Deep Chandra and Ramesh Chandra agreed mutually to exhange kurras but the trial Court wrongly changed kurras of the applicant Harish Chandra.

(3.) I find the impugned orders passed by the SDO, Jasrana and the Additional Commissioner, Agra well reasoned, speaking and evaluating of evidence and consequently deserve no interference.