TEERATH SINGH Vs. YOGENDRA SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL these three writ petitions are in between the same parties the sub ject matter of the suit being similar and controversy involved in all the writ petitions is same, therefore, for the sake of convenience, they are being decided by this common judg ment.

(2.) ALL these writ petitions have been filed for quashing the impugned orders dated 01-02-2005 and 8-8- 2005 passed by the trial court. By the order dated 1-2-2005, the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Roorkee re jected the application for grant of fur ther time to file the written statement and ordered the case to proceed ex-parte on the ground that the defend ant failed to file his written statement even after expiry of the period of 90 days after the service of summons on him on 11-8-2004. By the order dated 8-8- 2005, the application of the defendant-petitioner for setting aside the order dated 1-2-2005 was rejected by the Additional District Judge, I F. T. C. Roorkee at Roshanabad.

(3.) I have head Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner defendant and Sri M. S. Tyagi, learned counsel for the respondent and pe rused the entire material on record.