JITENDRA NATH SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

(2.) ACCORDING to the prosecution case the applicant was posted as store keeper in the office of Tubewell Division but he did not hand over the charge. He was suspended on 11.7.2001 and was reinstated on 12.9.2001. He was directed to handover the charge but thereafter the applicant did not return. A committee was constituted and inventory was prepared. As a result of physical verification the articles worth Rs. 7, 17,964.50p. and 1,17,376 were found short.