PHOOL CHANDRA Vs. GURU PATI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) UMESHWAR Pandey, J. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants.

(2.) THIS second appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 7- 7-2006 whereby the plaintiffs' appeal has been dismissed and the judgment and decree of the trial Court dismissing the suit of the appellants plaintiffs has been affirmed.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the appellants submits that the possession of the plaintiffs over the property in suit is obvious and the Courts below had not taken into consideration the agreement indicating to the facts that the defendant had received a sum of Rs. 15,000/- as earnest money from the plaintiffs and that possession of the property was given to them at the time of execution of that agreement.