SURYA PRASAD TRIPATHI Vs. LABOUR COURT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Sharma 1. Heard Dr. R. K. Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner who has sought review of the judgment and order passed by this Court in W.P. No. 8594 (S/S) of 1990 on October 15, 2004.

(2.) IT emerges from record that the petitioner was engaged under Regulation 5 (3) of U. P. Co -operative Services Rules, 1975. Under this provision, ad hoc temporary appointments are made for a stipulated period. The petitioner's services were terminated on 16.6.1980. Being aggrieved against the order of termination, a reference was made to the learned labour court at the instance of a bunch of employees. The following reference was made to the labour court for adjudication: ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMITTED]...

(3.) THIS Court after going through the material on record had dismissed the writ petition with the observation that it is open to the petitioner of W.P. No. 8594 (SS) of 1990, to approach the labour court in accordance with law if he feels any grievance about the fresh cause of action of the opposite parties.