REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

AINULHAQUE Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CHANDRAMA SINGH V. MANAGING DIRECTOR,U. P. CO-OPERATIVE UNION,LUCKNOW AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
H. B. GANDHI V. M/S. GOPINATH AND SONS [REFERRED TO]
U. P. STATE SPINNING CO. LTD. V. R. S. PANDEY AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
G VEERAPPA PILLAI PROPRIETOR SATHI VILASBUS SERVICE PORAYAR TANJORE DISTRICT MADRAS VS. RAMAN AND RAMAN LTD [REFERRED TO]
C A ABRAHAM VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER KOTTAYAM [REFERRED TO]
DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS COMPANY LIMITED VS. LUDH BUDH SINGH [REFERRED TO]
TITAGHUR PAPER MILLS COMPANY LIMITED VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. KRISHNA KANT [REFERRED TO]
SHEELA DEVI VS. JASPAL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION VS. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS MUMBAI [REFERRED TO]
TIN PLATE CO OF INDIA LIMITED VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
SHIVGONDA ANNA PATIL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. O C KRISHNAN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF H P VS. GUJARAT AMBUJA CEMENT LTD [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD VS. U P RAJYA SETU NIGAM SANYUKTA KARMACHARI SANGH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner was working as Asstt. Clerk in Bhatni unit of the U. P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. in district Deoria.

(3.) THE enquiry officer also found that on consideration of the statements of employees of the store room, that all employees who were posted in the store room fall within the zone of suspicion as second key was within the knowledge of everyone. Sri Amit Kumar Das who was store incharge used to maintain lock and key. Despite sealed lock and protected walls and roof, theft was committed for which Sri Das was mainly the responsible person as the second key was found in the drawer without lock and this was known to everyone. This shows their carelessness. Sri Haq, the petitioner has himself admitted that in the absence of Sri Das, he was fully responsible for locking and opening the lock as well as to get brought the keys from residence. THE first information regarding theft was given by him when he opened the store for delivery of some goods. THE lock and key were stolen at that very point of time and its theft raises a doubt.

Click here to view full judgment.

AINULHAQUE Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address