REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

NARENDRA SINGH Appellant

V/S

SURENDRA NATH DINGER Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

HIRALAL V. MAST RAM [REFERRED TO]
HARISH TANDON V. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,ALLAHABAD,U. P. AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR KANAUDIA V. IIND ADDITIONAL CITY MAGISTRATE. KANPUR [REFERRED TO]
SUDHAKAR SINGH V. AJMAL HUSAIN AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
KANDHAIYA LAL V. RENT CONTROL AND EVICTION OFFICER AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
SATYA NARAIN V. RENT CONTROL AND EVICTION OFFICER,KANPUR NAGAR AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
BRAHAM KUMAR AND OTHERS V. RAJA RAM AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
NARAYANI DEVI VS. MAHENDRA KR TRIPATHI [REFERRED TO]
BADRINARAYAN CHUNILAL BHUTADA VS. GOVINDRAM RAMGOPAL MUNDADA [REFERRED TO]
BRIJ MOHAN CHATURVEDI VS. XTH ADDL DIST JUDGE [REFERRED TO]
YOOTHIKA BHADORIA VS. UPPER NAGAR MAGISTRATE V PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY R C E O KANPUR NAGAR AND [REFERRED TO]
KAILASH NATH CHATURVEDI VS. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE COURT NO 12 [REFERRED TO]
RAM KUNWAR VS. IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE BANDA [REFERRED TO]
HARISH CHANDRA AGRAWAL VS. IIIRD A D J [REFERRED TO]
JOGENDRA SINGH BAJAJ VS. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE aforementioned writ petitions were heard and dismissed in open Court today for reasons to be recorded later on. My reasons for dismissing these writ petitions are as follows.

(2.) HEARD Sri Amitabh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant and Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for respondent-landlord.

(3.) THE petitioner has claimed himself to be a member of Amar Singh Sethi's family. As per petitioner, he is elder brother of Amar Singh Sethi and had been living in the first floor of the premises alongwith the family of Sri Sethi. Sri Amitabh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner has stressed that the petitioner is a family member of Sri Amar Singh Sethi and while shifting to his house at Arya Nagar, Sri Sethi had left the petitioner to continue in the premises as joint-tenant. THE petitioner Narendra Singh thus became a tenant of the said premises. He has also submitted that the petitioner was paying rent to the landlord and was recognized as a legal valid tenant.

Click here to view full judgment.

NARENDRA SINGH Vs. SURENDRA NATH DINGER

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address