SANTOSH KUMAR Vs. SARLA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.

(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri B. D. Mandhyan, Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Satish Mandhyan, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent.

(3.) THE appellate Court, after considering the material on record, recorded finding that the need of the landlady is bona fide and genuine. THE appellate Court also recorded a finding that two shops situated at Tundla, which were purchased by the landlady, were offered by the landlady to the tenant, which was not accepted by the tenant. It also relied on the fact that one another shop, situate in the very same market Baluganj Agra can be used by the tenant for running the business. THE appellate Court allowed the appeal and directed the tenant to hand over the possession within three months.