RAHUL KUMAR YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) G. P. Srivastva, J. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A.

(2.) ACCORDING to the prosecution case on 25-12-2005 the applicant was arrested and from his possession 800 gms. diazepam tablets, in all 4000 tablets, kept in four packs were recovered. The packets were kept in a white polythene bag which was held in the hand of the applicant.

(3.) IN the instant case Section 37 NDPS Act comes into play. There is nothing to presume that the accused has committed no offence. Moreover there is nothing to infer that if the applicant is released on bail he will not repeat the crime. There is no ground for bail. The bail application is rejected. Application rejected. .