IBRAHIM ANSARI Vs. PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard S/sri Madhav Jain and Rajneesh Baranwal Counsels for the petitioner ancl S/sri Dhruva Narayana and Bala Krishna Narayana, Counsels for the respon dents.

(2.) THIS writ petition is directed against the judgments and orders dated 18-2-2005 passed by District Judge, Mau in Rent Control Misc. Ap peal No. 150 of 1998 and dated 24 8-1998 passed by the Prescribed Authority/civil Judge (Junior Division), Mau in RA. Case No. 5 of 1003.

(3.) APART from his own affidavit reiterating the grounds mentioned in the written statement, the petitioner-tenant also filed affidavit of one Mohd. Idrish before the Prescribed Authority who stated that Sri Durga Dutt is carry ing on his independent business of Kirana i. e. , General Merchant, as such, need of the landlord was sham and fic titious.