SANGAM PASI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. N. Ojha, J. Instant revision has been preferred against the order dated 6-7-2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/ Fast Track Court No. 24, Allahabad, in ST No. 678 of 2001, State v. Sangam Pasi, police station Dhumanganj, Allahabad, whereby objection of the revisionist-accused against the charge, which was framed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge under Section 8/22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act) was rejected.

(2.) HEARD Sri Deepak Dubey, learned Counsel for the accused-revisionist, learned AGA and have gone through the record including the impugned order dated 6-7-2006.

(3.) THE learned Additional Sessions Judge has observed in the Impugned order that these points may be raised at the final arguments but the at the stage of charge only prima-facie consideration is to be made under Section 228 Cr. P. C.