SHIO PRASAD Vs. BANSHI MOHAN AGARWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner is a tenant of shop, in question for the last about 15 years at the rate of Rs. 82.50P per month besides taxes. He claims that his business of manufacturing tin boxes etc., from the said shop is the sole source of livelihood.

(3.) AGGRIEVED by the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2004 in S.C.C. Suit No. 39 of 1996, the petitioner challenged the same in S.C.C. Revision No. 1 of 2005 in the Court of District Judge, Aligarh. The revision was partly allowed by the respondent No. 2 vide judgment and order dated 10.8.2006 holding that the findings of the trial court with regard to service of notice are correct. In so far as issue No. 2 regarding default in payment of rent is concerned, it has been held that it is liable to be allowed for recovery of Rs. 2227.50P. The order of the revisional court is as under : ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMMITED]...