AKHILESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY the Court. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Q.H. Siddiqui, Advocate on behalf of Respondents No. 2 and 3 as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of Respondent No. 1.

(2.) THE controversy is no more res Integra. Petitioners are owners of Rick ­shaws and let out their Rickshaws on hire. Their grievance is that they should not be fastened with liability to pay Rs. 161 per Rickshaw per year, as licence fee and that they are prepared to pay Rs. 75 per Rickshaw.

(3.) IN the said order it is mentioned that any person who is doing business of letting out Rickshaws and from whom more than Rs. 75 per Rickshaw per year is charged shall be at liberty to file fresh Writ Petition.