RAM LAL Vs. NAGAR PALIKA HARDOI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SHAILENDRA Saksena, J. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the (Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and mandamus for quashing the part of the Award dated 15-1-1991, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-1 of the petition and for direction for reinstatement of the petitioner with full back wages and pay with interest.

(2.) BRIEF facts so far they are relevant for decision of this writ are that petitioner was working on the post of clerk on daily wages since 28-1-1984 and had completed more than 240 days of continuous service. Without complying with the provisions of U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, the services of the petitioner were dispensed with and he was retrenched, but before retrenchment neither written one month's notice was given nor any compensation as required under Section 6-N of the Industrial Disputes Act was paid to the petitioner nor procedure laid down for retrenchment was followed.

(3.) THE Tribunal further had directed that one month's pay in lieu of written notice and compensation on the basis of the total service rendered by the petitioner would be given.