RAM KUMAR AGRAHARI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -This application has been filed by the applicant Ram Kumar Agrahari with a prayer that he may be released on bail in Case Crime No. 685 of 2006 under Sections 498A and 304B, I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kotwali, district Jaunpur.

(2.) THE prosecution story in brief is that the F.I.R. of this case has been lodged by Sri Shiv Kumar, advocate on 8.5.2006 at about 12.15 p.m. in respect of the incident which had occurred in the night of 7/8.5.2006. THE F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicant and four other co-accused persons alleging therein that the marriage of the deceased Smt. Sarita Agrahari sister of the first informant was solemnized with the applicant about four years prior to the alleged occurrence. THE applicant and others co-accused persons were demanding Rs. 1 lac as dowry and to fulfil the same, they were subjecting the deceased to cruelty. THE first informant and his father came to the house of the applicant and stated that they were not capable to fulfil the aforesaid demand of dowry but in its reply, it was stated by the applicant and other co-accused persons that its bad consequences would be faced by the deceased. One week prior the alleged occurrence the deceased had telephonic talks with the first informant in which she stated that in case Rs. 1 lac was not given to the applicant and other co-accused persons, they may commit the murder of the deceased. Ultimately, on 8.5.2006 at about 8.30 a.m. the first informant received a telephonic message that his sister Smt. Sarita has been killed at her husband's house, on that information, the first informant and other persons came to the applicant and saw that she has been murdered to fulfil the demand of" dowry and to give it a colour of suicide, the deceased was hanged by her Sari.

(3.) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the deceased has committed suicide not on account of any demand of dowry or cruelty. All the allegations made in the F.I.R. in respect of the demand of dowry and cruelty with the deceased are absolutely false and baseless. Some other family members of the applicant were employed either at Delhi or at Gurgoan. The applicant has done a course of computer from Aptec and was doing the business of Cyber Cafe since November, 2003 in the City of Jaunpur in the name and style of Kumar Infosys, but the deceased was forcing the applicant to leave Jaunpur and to live either at Delhi or at Gurgoan but the applicant was not agreed to leave Jaunpur because the mother of the applicant had died in September, 2005 and the applicant was having two unmarried sisters. The father of the applicant is a heart patient and is unable to do day-to-day work of the house, due to this reason, the deceased had committed suicide. On the day of the alleged occurrence the applicant was not present at the house, he had gone to attend the Gauna ceremony of Smt. Rita Gupta which had taken place on 7.5.2006 at Chandauli because Ghanshyam Gupta cousin of the applicant has married with Smt. Rita Gupta. Ghan Shyam Gupta is posted at Gurgaon. The applicant and his other family members, reached at Chandauli at 8.00 p.m. on 7.5.2006 where the Gauna ceremony was performed, the applicant and others persons stayed there in the night of 7/8.5.2006. During investigation the Investigating Officer also recorded the statement of some persons who stated that the applicant and his family members had gone to Chandauli to attend with Gauna ceremony of Ghan Shyam Gupta. The applicant received a telephonic message given by Virendra Kumar Gupta what his wife committed suicide. He also gave information to the family members of the deceased at Varanasi and he also gave information to City control Room Jaunpur. The applicant is innocent, he has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in the present case only because he is husband of the deceased. In case he is released on bail, he shall not temper with the evidence.