STATE OF U P Vs. SADHU RAM MITTAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision under Section 115 of the C.P.C. has been preferred against the order dated 2.4.2004, passed by District Judge, Lucknow in an execution case whereby revisionists' objection moved under Section 47 of the C.P.C. has been rejected.

(2.) RELEVANT facts of the case, are that in pursuance of an agreement between the parties of this revision, with regard to execution of some work in Joshi Math, district Chamoli (now in Uttaranchal), the dispute was referred to the arbitrator by order of the High Court dated 24.3 1998 under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

(3.) I have heard the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the revisionist and Sri J. P. Goel appearing on behalf of the respondent-decree holder.