RAJENDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Sarvesh Agarwal learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. G. Arya learned Standing counsel for the State.

(2.) BY way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 23-8-1993 and 17-9-1992 passed by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 i. e. District Magistrate, Nainital and Pre scribed Authority/sub Divisional Mag istrate respectively.

(3.) I have heard the submissions of the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents- State and Sri Sarvesh Agarwal learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.