VED PRAKASH SHARMA Vs. NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has filed this writ petition against an order of termination passed on 16.10.2000 by the respondent No. 2, which has been confirmed in appeal by the respondent No. 4 on 21.11.2002.

(2.) Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner who was class IV employee appointed by the Executive Officer, therefore his services could have been terminated only by an order passed by the Executive Officer under the provisions of Sections 75 and 76 of the U P. Municipalities Act, which reads as under:

(3.) He has argued that the impugned order has been passed by the President despite the fact that the Executive Officer was present in the respondent Nagar Palika.