TAJENDRA CHAWLA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Counsel for the petitioner. Sri P. N. Saxena, senior advocate appearing for the respondents and the learned standing Counsel.

(2.) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 7-8-2004 passed by Joint Director of Education (Annexure-1 to the writ petition ).

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner, challenging the order, contended that the order of Joint Director of Education holding respondent No. 6 senior is incorrect. He submits that petitioner's transfer being under Chapter III, Regulations 55 to 62, her services prior to transfer have to be added for the purposes of seniority by virtue of Regulation 59 of Chapter III. He submits that Joint Director of Education committed error in reckoning the seniority of the petitioner only from 1-11-1983.