SITAPUR EYE HOSPITAL Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE ALMORA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri B. K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) BY the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed by the District Judge by which the appeal of the respondent no. 2 has been allowed.

(3.) IN support of the application filed under section 21 (1) (a)of the U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 Dr. A. Mehrotra has filed an affidavit stating therein that the respond ent no. 2 is a tenant at the rate of Rs. 60/- per month of two room accommo dation along with other amenities and the premises is required for accommo dating the patients, who use to come for the treatment and therefore, the require ment is bonafide.