SWAMI DIN Vs. VARDANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Pandey This is a revision petition under Section 333 of the UPZA & LR Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), preferred against the judgment and order, dated 15-10-2004, passed by the learned Collector, Mahoba in case Nos. 12/35/81/12/2003 under Section198 (4) of the Act.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated, the facts, giving rise to the instant revision petition are that on the application of the revisionist, Swami Din etc. , proceedings under Section 198 (4) of the Act were initiated against the opposite parties, allottees for cancellation of the leases, granted in their favour. On notice, the allottees contested the proceedings, denying the allegations and inter alia, pleading that since the revisionists have no concern with the land, in dispute and the same is the property of the Gaon Sabha, concerned, the leases, in question, have validly been granted in their favour. The learned Collector, concerned, after completing the requisite formalities, vide his order, dated 15-10-2004, rejected this application of the revisionists, maintaining the leases in question and therefore, it is against this order that the instant revision petition has been preferred by the complainants before the Board.

(3.) IN view of the above, this revision petition fails and is accordingly, dismissed and the impugned order, passed by the learned Collector, concerned is hereby, confirmed and maintained. Let records be returned forthwith, to the Court concerned. Revision dismissed .