BHAGWAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. Dikshit, J. A notice under Section 29 (b) of U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (in short Act') has given rise to this petition. The notice has been issued to petitioner as State claims the land which was unirrigated to have become irrigated after enforcement of U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1972 (in short Amending Act' ). The claim of State is that cer tain land, which was unirrigated has come within the command area of a State tube-well constructed after enforcement of Amending Act and, therefore, the Ceil ing area of petitioners is to be re-determined.

(2.) THE determination of unirrigated land, which has become irrigated after enforcement of U. P. Act No. 18 of 1973, is to be done in accordance with Section 4-A, Secondly. THE claim of State before appellate court has been that Khasras entries for the year 1378-F to 1380-F are not relevant as the notice to petitioner ha

(3.) LD the land as irrigated. He heLD the land to be irrigated as according to him the land was within the command areas of a State Irrigation Work and it was capable of growing two crops.