NANAK SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. L. Sharma, J. These are two petitions under Section 482, Cr. P. C. for quashing the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 3 of 1992, initiated under Section 145, Cr. P. C. pending before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chandpur, District Bijnor, and for quashing the orders passed on 24-6-1994 and 30-1-1995 by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bijnor directing the applicant to deposit in the Court Rs. 24,700 and Rs. 30,000 as the price of the cane crops harvested by him in the disputed land.

(2.) I have heard Sri Veer Singh counsel for the applicant and Sri Anil Sharma, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 as well as learned A. Q. A. and perused the materials brought on the record in both the petitions.

(3.) FROM the perusal of the admitted facts of the cases it is crystal clear that opposite patty No. 2 Nanwa has thing to do with the land of the Qaon Sabha and with the cane crops cultivated and harvested by he applicant during these years right from 1992. He was merely interested to restrain the applicant from harvesting the crops Even though he clearly admitted that the applicant who was in actual possession of the land, even after the expiry of the period of allotment of the Gaon Sabha land.