BALWANT SAINI Vs. D J MAINPURI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Srivastava, J. Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the District Judge, Mainpuri, retiring the petitioner from service in public interest exercising the jurisdiction envisaged under Rule 56 as amended, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking redress praying f of the quashing of the said order.

(2.) I have heard Sri K. Ajit, learned Counsel of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents who has also produced the original service book of the petitioner along with the medical report, dated 11-5-1978 submitted by the Chief Medical Officer, Mainpuri in regard to the age of the petitioner.

(3.) IT further appears that en the basis of the aforesaid corrected entry of the petitioner's date of birth treating the petitioner to be more than 55 years of age his case was referred to a screening committee which after considering the service record of the petitioner recommended for his being compulsorily retired, from service vide its report dated 10-8-1989. The District Judge, Main puri vide his order dated 17th October, 1989 accepted the recommen dations of the screening committee and thereafter issued the impugned order compulsorily retiring the petitioner from service.