VIRENDRA KUMAR MISRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. The petitioner has challenged the order, dated 27-11-1991 issued by the Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur, respondent No. 3, reverting the. petitioner from the post of Stenographer Grade-1 to the post of Stenographer Grade-II.

(2.) THE facts, in brief, are that one Mahadev Prasad, Stenographer, Grade-I in the Collectorate Azamgarh retired on 31-7-1989 and on his retire ment a post of Stenographer fell vacant. THEn was another post of Stenographer, Grade II created under Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Budhanpur, district Azamgarh. Both these posts were advertised in the newspaper Hindi daily 'aaj' on 3-9-1989.

(3.) THE petitioner was selected for the post of Stenographer Grade-I by direct recruitment. THE Additional District Magistrate (Administration) submitted a report to the District Magistrate, Azamgarh on 6th September, 1989. This was approved by the District Magistrate on 6th September, 1989 and on the same date the petitioner was issued appointment letter. His appointment was temporary. THE services of the petitioner were confirmed on 1-7-1991.