USHA SHARMA Vs. BANK OF BARODA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. S. Sinha, J. Heard Sri Yashartha, holding brief of SriAjeet Kumar,learned counsel appearing for the defendant- revisionists.

(2.) AFTER perusing the impugned order, the amendment application of the defendant-revisionists and objection filed on behalf of the plaintiff-opposite party and upon hearing the learned counsel, at length and in detail, the court is satisfied that the court below has, in the facts and circumstances of the case and on the material placed before it, rightly declined to permit the defendant-revisionists to incorporate in the written statement the amendments sought for by them. In declining the amendments sought by the defendant-revisionists, the court below did not act either illegally or with any materials irregularity in exercise of jurisdiction. The order is perfect.

(3.) ALL told it is not a fit case for interference by this court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and deserves to be dismissed.