SURENDRA NATH SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) N. B. Asthana, J. This revision has been directed against the summon ing order passed by IV Addl. C. J. M. , Shahjahanpur in Crime No. 272 of 1988 under Sections 147, 307, 504 and 506, IPC, P. S. Seramau North, Shahjahanpur. A preliminary objection was raised as to whether a revision against the summoning order is maintainable.

(2.) IN Kailash Chaudhari v. State of U. P. , 1994 Ail LJ 174 : 1994 JIC 422 it was held that an order issuing process on exparte consideration of the complaint and the material under Section 204 of the Code being only a step towards trial is an interlocutory order against which no revision lies.

(3.) THE revision is misconceived and is dismissed. Revision dismissed. .