DEVKINANDAN AGRAWAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. B. Mehrotra, J. All the aforesaid Review Petitions have been filed against my judgment, dated 15th of May, 1995 dismissing Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12024 of 1992 along with 82 writ petitions decided by the same judgment.

(2.) THE present review applications have been filed by the applications in Civil Misc. Writ Petitions No. 885, 886, 887, 888 and 891 of 1992 which have also been dismissed by the same judgment.

(3.) THE grievance of the other applicants in the present review applications, who were petitioners in Civil Misc. Writ Petitions No. 886 of 1992, 387 of 1992, 888 of 1992 and 891 of 1992, is of similar nature. THE only difference in these cases is that while in the case of Devidnandan Agrawal, the defendant in his suit was Srnt. Krishna Kapoor while in the case of Abhinandan Agrawal, the petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 886 of 1992, the suit for declaration under Section 229-B of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was filed arraying Sri Shashi Kapoor as a defendant in the suit. In the writ petition filed by Smi. Surajmukhi being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 887 of 1992,. she claims to have sought a declaration under Section 229-B of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, arraying Sri Randhir Kapoor and others as defendant- Again in the case of Srinandan Agrawal, the petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ Petitiion No. 888 of 1992, the defendant in his suit was Smt. Uma Sial and in the case olashok Kumar, the petitioner in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 891 of 1992, the defendant in his suit was again Smt. Uma Sial.