SUBHASH CHANDRA JAISWAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. C. Jain, J. Heard.

(2.) THE petitioner as per the allegations made in the revision-petition, wont to lodge a report at the police station Sadar, district Saharanpur regard ing the incident dated 17-6-1995, his report was not recorded as a F1k. THEn he moved the higher authority i. e. SSP District Saharanpur but to no effect. He thereafter moved an application before Magistrate concerned i. e. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur. THE CJM after calling the report from the police station concerned, did not find any case for ordering the registration of the case and its investigation as provided under Section 156 (3), Crpc.

(3.) THE impugned order shows that the CJM has taken into considera tion the report of the police and other circumstances but he did not find it a fit case to exercise the power under Section 156 (3), Crpc. i do not find any illegality and infirmity in the impugned order and decline to interfere in the revisional jurisdiction. THE same is hereby dismissed in limine.