KAPTAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) N. B. Asthana, J. The revisionists was committed to stand trial in the Court of Session by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad on 28. 1. 95 for the offence punish able under Sections 147,148,149 and 302 I. P. C, P. S. Kayamganj, Farrukhabad.

(2.) THE grievance of the revisionist is that he was committed without following the procedure as prescribed by Sections 207 and 209 Cr. P. C. and, therefore, the order of commitment should be quashed.

(3.) IN view of the fact that there is an endorsement of the counsel for the accused regarding the receipt of copies, it cannot be said that no copies at all were supplied to the revisionist. The commitment order shows that all the required copies were furnished to the accused under Section 207 Cr. P. C. IN view of the above it cannot be said that the committing court has at fault in committing the case without following the provisions of Section 207 Cr. P. C.