(1.) K. L. Sharma, J. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 1. 6. 1994, passed by the opposite party No. 2 and the judgment dated 25. 3. 1995 passed by the opposite party No. 1 in the execution of Form 'd' issued under U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972.
(2.) I have heard Sri P. C. Agarwal, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 3 and Sri B. K. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the opposite parties 1 and 2 and perused the record.
(3.) IT has been submitted on behalf of the opposite party No. 3 that the execution of the orders passed by the Rent Control Officer, has reached the stage of issuance of Form 'd prescribed under that Act for eviction of the petitioner and the Rent Control Officer has again heard the objections of the petitioner Smt. Gita Devi and rejected the same vide his order by Additional District Magistrate R/c, Lucknow. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has again challenged the same order. I do not find any ground for challenge of the execution of Form 'd' issued after full contest upto the level of High Court. The petitioner has already challenged and tested the impugned order of Additional District Magistrate R/c, Lucknow by filing the Rent Revision No. 14/94 which has been rejected on 25. 3. 1995, by the Addl. District Judge, Lucknow.