RAM UGRAH SINGH Vs. D D C VARANASI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) G. S. N. Tripathi, J. This is a Ashok Kumar and thus they have no more interest in the disputed property. Their objection could stand dismissed. Ram Ugrah Singh would have one half share in the disputed property and remaining half would belong to Smt. Sohra Devi. The compromise was verified before the Consolidation Officer and an order writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ in the nature of certiorari commanding opposite party No. 1 to produce the record of the case for perusal of the Court and quash the judgment of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation (S. O. C.) dated 5. 9. 73 (Annexure 3) and also the judgment of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 18. 12. 73 (Annexure 5 ).

(2.) THE facts of the case are very simple. In the basic year, the name of Smt. Sohra Devi, wife of Hanumant was recorded. Smt. Ganga Devi, respondent No. 5 filed an objection under Section 9 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act claiming herself to be a co-sharer with Smt. Sohra Devi, respondent No. 4 (now deceased) and Ashok Kumar Singh, respondent No. 6. She also set up a pedigree.

(3.) ON 5. 9. 73, Smt. Ganga Devi filed an application before the Consolidation Officer that, in fact, she had not entered into any compromise on 24. 9. 72 at all. The contents of the same were not read over and explained to her. A fraud had been played upon her. She had not received any money whatsoever from Ram Ugrah Singh. Ram Ugrah Singh does not belong to this family. He alleged to have become sirdar by virtue of an illegal transfer in the shape of a compromise.