(1.) S. P. Srivastava, J. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Regional Deputy Director of Education in the proceedings under Section 16-A (7) of the U. P. Intermediate Education Act, whereunder the Committee of Management elected on 14-8-1994 with Madan Kumar vasishtha as its Manager had been granted recognition after rejecting the claim of Bal Kishan Agrawal terminating The arrangement of single operation of the accounts of the college maintained under the provisions of U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1991, the petitioners have now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the said order the direction to the respondents not to interfere in their functioning duly constituted managing committee of Sri Devatary Adarsh Inter College Karnvash, district Bulandshahr.
(2.) I have heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing No. 1,2 and 3 as well as Sri Ashok Bhushan, learned Counsel representing the respondent No. 4.
(3.) THE learned Counsel for the contesting respondents have not disputed this fact that the additional material had been allowed to be brought on record by the Regional Deputy Director of Education and was also utilised against the petitioners. It is also not disputed that the copies of the additional material were not made available to the petitioners. However, what has been urged is that on the date fixed for hearing, the Regional Deputy Director of Education had allowed the parties an oppor tunity to file additional evidence.