JEET SINGH Vs. STATE OF O P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) N. B. Asthana, J. The revisionist was named in the FIR as one of the accused. Neither charge-sheet nor final report was submitted although against the coaccused charge-sheet was laid for the offences punishable under Sec tions 308, 323 and 324, IPC. The co-accused were committed to the Court of Session. Learned VIth All Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat where the sessions trial was transferred for disposal summoned the revisionist under Section 193, Crpc for the offences punishable under Sections 308, 323 and 324, IPC. Aggrieved by it he has come to this Court in revision.

(2.) IN view of Kishan Singh v. State of Bihar, 1993 JIC 443 (SC) : JT 1993 (1) SC 173, the order of the Court below summoning him under Sec tion 193, Crpc is in accordance with law.

(3.) THE revision has thus no force and is dismissed at the admission stage. Revision dismissed. .