PRADUM NARESH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PARITOSH K. Mukherjee, J. Although this matter is appearing for admission in the presence of both the parties, but it appears from the office report that the writ petition is filed out of time by five days.

(2.) HAVING considered the strong case in favour of the petitioner, the said delay in moving the writ petition of five days is condoned, and, by the consent of both the parties, the entire writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.

(3.) INITIALLY a notice under Section 10 (2) of the U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1973 (from hereinafter referred to as Act) was served upon Sri Chunni Lal some times in 1974.