ARTI PANCHPURI Vs. DEENA NATH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. C. Jain, J. The facts given rise to this revision petition are that in case filed by Smt. Arti Panchpuri five persons, namely, Deena Nath, Nirmal Kumar, Vimal Kumar, Smt. Prem Devi and Smt. Sadhna Devi were convicted and sentenced under Section 498-A, I. P. C. Smt. Prema Devi and Smt. Sadhna Devi, opposite party Nos. 4 and 5 respectively, were released on probation under the U. P. First Offenders' Probation Act, whereas the remaining three opposite parties, namely, Deena Nath, Nirmal Kumar and Vimal Kumar, were sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 each and in default of payment of fine to undergo one month rigorous imprisonment.

(2.) FEELING aggrieved, all the five persons filed an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal, i. e. Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 1989, challenging the order of the trial court. The learned Sessions Judge also gave the benefit of Section 4 of the U. P. First Offenders' Probation Act to the three opposite parties, i. e. Deena Nath, Nirmal Kumar and Vimal Kumar and ordered for their release on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 2,000 each with one surety in the like amount for keeping peace and be of good behaviour for a period of two years. The fine amount of Rs. 800 each has already been deposited by all the three opposite parties, i. e. Deena Nath, Nirmal Kumar and Vimal Kumar, in court.

(3.) WITH these observations the revision petition stands disposed of finally. Revision disposed of. .