RAM CHANDRA CHATURVEDI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Sharma, J. Sri C. K. Parikh appears for the applicants. Sri R. Pandey appears for opposite party No. 2 and learned A. G. A. appears in person.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(3.) THE learned counsel for Paltu (opposite, party No. 2) has placed reliance on the circumstance that Paltu has got himself medically examined from the Doctor of the Primary Medical Health Center on the date of occurrence itself and the Doctor had recorded as many as 3 injuries on his body. It is a case in which the Magistrate would have to assess the evidence at the stage of trial to come to the conclusion as to whether offences had been committed by the applicants or not. THEre was enough material before him to justify summoning of the accused-applicants on the basis of the complaint aforesaid made by Paltu.