KHAZAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SRI D. N. Wall Advocate appears on behalf of the applicant-revisionist and learned Addl. Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(3.) IN the result, the revision is dismissed. The conviction of the accused- revisionist under Section 25 of the Arms Act is maintained. However, his sentence of imprisonment is reduced to the period of imprisonment already suffered by him so far but a sentence of fine of Rs. 1,000 is imposed on him in lieu of the period of imprisonment reduced. The: amount of fine shall be paid by the accused revisionist within a period of three months from today. IN default of payment of fine, the accused-revisionist shall be taken into custody and he shall suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months.