RAM CHETAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the continuation of the order of suspension dated 4.9.1995.

(2.) SRI S. C. Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently urged before me that in view of recent judgment of Honourable M. Katju, J., delivered on 19.12.1994, in the case of Jagjeet Singh v. State of U. P. and another, 1995 (1) ESC 329 (All), the petitioner deserves to be given benefit, and there is no necessity of continuation of suspension order. Further since the petitioner was taken into police custody and was enlarged on bail on 24.8.1995, there is no earthly reason in putting the petitioner under suspension, even after his enlargement.

(3.) SRI K. M. Sahai, learned standing counsel also pointed out that the case of Jagjeet Singh (supra) has already been referred to a Larger Bench by Honourable S.P. SRIvastava, J. and Honourable B. K. Roy, J.