SIDDHDRTH KUMAR DAS Vs. VISHNU PRTSAU UUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. Narayan, J. This criminal revision is directed against the order, dated ITMO-1988 tendered by 111 Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Revision Nos. 87 of 1988 and 88 of 1988, both petitioners of Dr. Siddiiarth Kumar Das v. Vishnu Prasad Gupta. It appears from the record that there h"as been some proceedings under Section 482, Ci. P. C. from the statement of the learned counsel for the applicant it is evident that the matter relating to the title and possession of the property covered by the proceeding under Section 145, Cr. P. C. has already been decid ed by some competent civil court, may be as a matter of temporary measure in the disposal of the application for injunction.

(2.) IT is not disputed that the order of the civil court even though passed during injunction proceedings is to be given due respect of the courts while dealing wi'. h the property iu the proceeding under Section 145, Cr. P. C. This situation also btocd on the date of the order.