AJAI BINDAL Vs. PRASHANT GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) N. L. Ganguly, J. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 23rd September, 1995 passed by the IV Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meerut substituting the names of Anil Gupta, Arvind Gupta, Prashant Gupta, Ajay Bindal and Sanjay Bindal under Order XXII, Rule 5, C. P. C. as legal heirs and representatives of late Sri Satendra Lal Gupta and also allowed the application (42-ka) allowing the amendments prayed in the said application under Order 6, Rule 17, C. P. C.

(2.) IN this revision, the opposite parties are represented by Sri Ashok Khare and Sri Sharal Srivastava, representing all the respondents except respondent No. 2, who is also represented by Sri Anurag Khanna. Since all the parties in the case are represented and the counsel for the respondents made a statement that they do not propose to file any counter affidavit and the documents filed with the application are stated to be sufficient which are not controverted, thus, without formerly admitting the civil revision or calling for the record of the court below, I consider it appropriate to finally hear the revision and dispose it.

(3.) PLAINTIFF Prashant Gupta set up a case and pleaded that a Will dated 20. 2. 95 was left by Satendra Lal Gupta, deceased by which plaintiff Anil Gupta, Arvind Gupta, sons of late Mohan Lai Gupta, Ajay Bindal, Sanjay Bindal sons of Brij Bhusan Lal Bindal were shown as beneficiaries under the said Will.